4.6 Article

Drastic change of the Casimir force at the metal-insulator transition

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 80, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.125119

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Security Agency (NSA)
  2. Laboratory of Physical Sciences (LPS)
  3. Army Research Office (ARO)
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EIA-0130383]
  5. JSPS-RFBR [06-02-91200]
  6. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [219-09]
  7. Ukrainian Academy of Science
  8. Ukrainian Academy of Science [VC 38/V 139-18]
  9. Ministry of Science, Culture and Sport of Japan [18740224]
  10. EPSRC [EP/D072581/1, EP/F005482/1]
  11. ESF networkprogram Arrays of Quantum Dots and Josephson Junctions.
  12. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D072581/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18740224] Funding Source: KAKEN
  14. EPSRC [EP/D072581/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dependence of the Casimir force on material properties is important for both future applications and to gain further insight on its fundamental aspects. Here we apply the general Lifshitz theory of the Casimir force to low-conducting compounds, or poor metals. For distances in the micrometer range, the Casimir force for a large variety of such materials is described by universal equations containing a few parameters: the effective plasma frequency omega(p), dissipation rate gamma of the free carriers, and electric permittivity epsilon(infinity) for omega >=omega(p) (in the infrared range). This theory of the Casimir force for poor metals can also describe inhomogeneous composite materials containing small regions with different conductivity. The Casimir force for systems involving samples made with compounds that have a metal-insulator transition shows a drastic change of the Casimir force within the transition region, where the metallic and dielectric phases coexist. Indeed, the Casimir force can increase by a factor of 2 near this transition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据