4.6 Article

Angle-resolved photoemission study of the evolution of band structure and charge density wave properties in RTe3 (R=Y, La, Ce, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy)

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 77, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.235104

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/E004490/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a detailed angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) investigation of the RTe(3) family, which sets this system as an ideal textbook example for the formation of a nesting driven charge density wave (CDW). This family indeed exhibits the full range of phenomena that can be associated to CDW instabilities, from the opening of large gaps on the best nested parts of Fermi surface (up to 0.4 eV), to the existence of residual metallic pockets. ARPES is the best suited technique to characterize these features, thanks to its unique ability to resolve the electronic structure in k space. An additional advantage of RTe(3) is that the band structure can be very accurately described by a simple two dimensional tight-binding (TB) model, which allows one to understand and easily reproduce many characteristics of the CDW. In this paper, we first establish the main features of the electronic structure by comparing our ARPES measurements with the linear muffin-tin orbital band calculations. We use this to define the validity and limits of the TB model. We then present a complete description of the CDW properties and of their strong evolution as a function of R. Using simple models, we are able to reproduce perfectly the evolution of gaps in k space, the evolution of the CDW wave vector with R, and the shape of the residual metallic pockets. Finally, we give an estimation of the CDW interaction parameters and find that the change in the electronic density of states n(E(F)), due to lattice expansion when different R ions are inserted, has the correct order of magnitude to explain the evolution of the CDW properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据