4.6 Article

Control of inhomogeneous atomic ensembles of hyperfine qudits

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022302

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-0903692]
  2. EU
  3. IARPA MQCO
  4. CQuIC NSF [PHY-0903953]
  5. NSERC
  6. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) through the Army Research Office
  7. QuantumWorks
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Physics [0903953] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Physics [0903692] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the ability to control d-dimensional quantum systems (qudits) encoded in the hyperfine spin of alkali-metal atoms through the application of radio- and microwave-frequency magnetic fields in the presence of inhomogeneities in amplitude and detuning. Such a capability is essential to the design of robust pulses that mitigate the effects of experimental uncertainty and also for application to tomographic addressing of particular members of an extended ensemble. We study the problem of preparing an arbitrary state in the Hilbert space from an initial fiducial state. We prove that inhomogeneous control of qudit ensembles is possible based on a semianalytic protocol that synthesizes the target through a sequence of alternating rf and microwave-driven SU(2) rotations in overlapping irreducible subspaces. Several examples of robust control are studied, and the semianalytic protocol is compared to a brute-force, full numerical search. For small inhomogeneities, < 1%, both approaches achieve average fidelities greater than 0.99, but the brute-force approach performs superiorly, reaching high fidelities in shorter times and capable of handling inhomogeneities well beyond experimental uncertainty. The full numerical search is also applied to tomographic addressing whereby two different nonclassical states of the spin are produced in two halves of the ensemble.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据