4.6 Article

Mechanism of foam destruction by antifoams: a molecular dynamics study

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 32, 页码 17231-17237

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp02038c

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC Project [21173128]
  2. Key NSF Project of Shandong province [ZR2011B0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In enhanced oil recovery (EOR), the micro-oil droplet heavily affected the stability of foam and prevented foam flooding. In this paper, the oil bridge-stretching mechanism of foam rupture was described through molecular dynamics with the aim of providing supplements to the experiments at the molecular level. Two important phenomena for foam rupture have been pointed out by the simulation. One is about the pseudoemulsion film, representing the stability of the oil water air three phase interface. The bound water connecting the headgroups of the surfactant through strong H-bonding interactions played a vital rote in the stability of the pseudoemulsion film. These water molecules could hinder the disappearance of the water phase in the pseudoemulsion film. The additional energy barrier, which was influenced by the surfactant concentration, also played a vital role in preventing the destruction process. The other factor is about the oil bridge, which appeared after the destruction of the pseudoemulsion film. The external horizontal force stretched the bridge resulting in the destruction of the bridge. The process was decided by the properties of the oil molecules. In the simulation, the stretching force was divided into three stages including the initial increasing force, the middle equilibrium force and the final decreasing force. Especially the second equilibrium force, which stretched the middle of the oil bridge so that it became thin, was vital to the foam rupture. The concentration and properties of the oil molecules were the crucial factors for foam rupture. The simulated results offer important supplements to experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据