4.6 Article

Population transfer for signal enhancement in pulsed EPR experiments on half integer high spin systems

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 11, 期 31, 页码 6799-6806

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b906177k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Binational USA-Israel Science foundation (BSF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High resolution pulse EPR techniques applied to half integer high spin systems, such as Mn2+ (S = 5/2), usually focus only on the central vertical bar -1/2 > -> vertical bar 1/2 > transition. The reason is that at high fields, where the zero field splitting is considerably smaller than the Zeeman interaction, the spectrum of this transition is intense and narrow. However, because the experiments are carried out at low temperatures, the low lying levels are heavily populated and the signal of the central transition is nevertheless diminished. This, in turn affects the sensitivity of the pulse EPR technique applied. A transfer of populations from the lower lying levels, which for Mn2+ are the vertical bar-3/2 > and vertical bar-5/2 > levels, to the vertical bar-1/2 > level will therefore increase the sensitivity. Here we describe such an experiment, where a rapid magnetic field sweep over the vertical bar-3/2 > -> vertical bar-1/2 > sub- spectrum is carried out, concomitantly with a low power microwave (mw) irradiation, which results in population inversion. After this sweep any pulsed EPR sequence can be applied to the central transition that now has a population difference that deviates from the equilibrium value. The feasibility of the experiment is demonstrated at W-band (95 GHz) on Mn2+ doped in MgO for echo-detected EPR measurements and the dependence of the signal enhancement on the rate and range of the magnetic field sweep and on the mw power is described. The results are then accounted for theoretically by considering a simple fictitious spin 1/2 system. In addition, preliminary enhanced Mn-55 pulse ENDOR electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) spectra are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据