4.4 Article

Two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging of intracellular chloride in cockroach salivary glands

期刊

PHOTOCHEMICAL & PHOTOBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 319-327

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1039/b813797h

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Department for Science and Education BMBF [IP 03/517]
  2. German Research Foundation DFG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although chloride plays an important role in many cellular processes, there is a lack of data about intracellular chloride concentrations [Cl-](i), particularly due to technical problems. To overcome that, in this study fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in the time-domain by using time-correlated single-photon counting was combined with two-photon excitation (2P-FLIM). This 2P-FLIM setup has been successfully used with the Cl--sensitive fluorescent dye N-(ethoxycarbonylmethyl)-6-methoxy-quinolinium bromide (MQAE) in order to measure [Cl-](i) in cockroach salivary glands, a well-established model system for studying epithelial ion transport processes. MQAE was well suitable for two-photon excitation, when loaded into cells, and displayed a sufficient dynamic range of its fluorescence decay time changes in response to variation of [Cl-](i) according to the Stern-Volmer relationship. On this basis a uniform [Cl-](i) in the range of 42-80 mM with a mean value of 59 mM +/- 1 mM was found in resting cockroach salivary ducts, indicating active Cl- accumulation. However, exposure to Cl--free saline caused only a moderate [Cl-](i) drop to 48 mM +/- 4 mM, suggesting a relatively low basolateral Cl- permeability in ducts, at least under resting conditions. Additionally, bath application of the biogenic amine dopamine, known to stimulate the saliva modi. cation in the ducts, caused no significant [Cl-](i) changes. These results suggest a more complex scenario of [Cl-](i) homeostasis in cockroach salivary ducts. In conclusion, 2P-FLIM seems to be a suitable technique for quantitative [Cl-](i) measurements in many biological systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据