4.5 Review

Numerical simulations of two-fluid turbulent mixing at large density ratios and applications to the Rayleigh-Taylor instability

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0185

关键词

mixing; turbulence; Rayleigh-Taylor instability; molecular dynamics; lattice Boltzmann method; direct numerical simulations

资金

  1. LDRD programme at Los Alamos National Laboratory [20090058DR]
  2. Division Of Physics
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1136672] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tentative review is presented of various approaches for numerical simulations of two-fluid gaseous mixtures at high density ratios, as they have been applied to the Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI). Systems exhibiting such RTI behaviour extend from atomistic sizes to scales where the continuum approximation becomes valid. Each level of description can fit into a hierarchy of theoretical models and the governing equations appropriate for each model, with their assumptions, are presented. In particular, because the compressible to incompressible limit of the Navier-Stokes equations is not unique and understanding compressibility effects in the RTI critically depends on having the appropriate basis for comparison, two relevant incompressible limits are presented. One of these limits has not been considered before. Recent results from RTI simulations, spanning the levels of description presented, are reviewed in connection to the material mixing problem. Owing to the computational limitations, most in-depth RTI results have been obtained for the incompressible case. Two such results, concerning the asymmetry of the mixing and small-scale anisotropy anomaly, as well as the possibility of a mixing transition in the RTI, are surveyed. New lines for further investigation are suggested and it is hoped that bringing together such diverse levels of description may provide new ideas and increased motivation for studying such flows.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据