4.5 Article

Analgesic effects of lidocaine, morphine and diclofenac on movement-induced nociception, as assessed by the Knee-Bend and CatWalk tests in a rat model of osteoarthritis

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 101, 期 4, 页码 617-624

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.03.003

关键词

Osteoarthritis; Pain; CatWalk; Knee-Bend; Pharmacological modulation; Lidocaine; Morphine; Diclofenac

资金

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation
  2. Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education
  3. FEDER
  4. [POCI/SAU-NEU/60853/2004]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [POCI/SAU-NEU/60853/2004] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pain is the major symptom of osteoarthritis (OA) and the main reason for patients seeking medical care, but its treatment is not optimal. Animal studies are necessary to elucidate mechanisms underlying OA-induced pain and assess analgesics' efficacy. Previously, we showed that the Knee-Bend test and dynamic weight bearing by the CatWalk test are clinically relevant methods for assessing movement-induced nociception in the mono-iodoacetate (MIA) OA model. Using the same tests, in the present study we investigate the effects of lidocaine (5 mg, 10% solution, intra-articular), morphine (6 mg/kg, subcutaneous) and diclofenac (30 mg/kg per os) on nociceptive behavior in OA animals, on days 3 and 20 of OA evolution. Morphine reduced nociceptive behavior in both tests at both time-points. Lidocaine also decreased nociceptive behavior in both tests on day 3, but on day 20 only reduced the Knee-Bend score. Diclofenac was highly effective in both tests on day 3, while on day 20 it induced a less pronounced decrease in the Knee-Bend score and was ineffective in the CatWalk test. The results showed that the Knee-Bend and CatWalk tests are reliable alternative methods for evaluating movement-induced nociception in OA animals, and measure nociception in a clinically relevant way, since an analgesic profile similar to the one described in humans was observed. Therefore, these tests might be important as good predictors of drug efficacy. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据