4.2 Article

Antipsychotic drugs upregulate lipogenic gene expression by disrupting intracellular trafficking of lipoprotein-derived cholesterol

期刊

PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 396-407

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2009.62

关键词

antipsychotic drugs; lipoprotein; cholesterol; amphiphile; SREBP; LXR

资金

  1. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia [PR36]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [568619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) have been reported to induce lipogenic genes. This has been proposed to contribute to their efficacy in treating schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders, as well as the metabolic side effects often associated with these drugs. The precise mechanism for the lipogenic effects of APDs is unknown, but is believed to involve increased activation of the lipogenic transcription factors, such as sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs). In a series of experiments in a model cell line, we found that a panel of typical and atypical APDs inhibited transport of lipoprotein-derived cholesterol to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which houses the cholesterol homeostatic machinery. APDs belong to the class of cationic amphiphiles and as has been shown for other amphiphiles, caused lipoprotein-derived cholesterol to accumulate intracellularly, preventing it from being esterified in the ER and suppressing SREBP activation. APDs did not activate the liver X receptor, another transcription factor involved in lipogenesis. However, these drugs markedly reduced cholesterol synthesis. This paradoxical result indicates that the upregulation of SREBP-target genes by APDs may not translate to increased cellular cholesterol levels. In conclusion, we have determined that APDs disrupt intracellular trafficking and synthesis of cholesterol, which may have important clinical ramifications. The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2010) 10, 396-407; doi:10.1038/tpj.2009.62; published online 8 December 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据