4.2 Article

Cytochrome P450 2D6 activity predicts discontinuation of tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer patients

期刊

PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 258-264

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2009.14

关键词

tamoxifen; cytochrome P450 2D6; pharmacogenetics; compliance; adherence

资金

  1. Indiana University GCRC [M01RR00750]
  2. University of Michigan GCRC [M01-RR00042]
  3. Georgetown University [M01-RR13297]
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Bethesda, MD, USA)
  5. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (VS)
  6. Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale (DFH)
  7. Breast Cancer Research Foundation [N003173]
  8. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [M01-RR000042]
  9. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  10. [U-01 GM61373]
  11. [T-32 GM007767]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen is routinely used for treatment and prevention of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Studies of tamoxifen adherence suggest that over half of patients discontinue treatment before the recommended 5 years. We hypothesized that polymorphisms in CYP2D6, the enzyme responsible for tamoxifen activation, predict for tamoxifen discontinuation. Tamoxifen-treated women (n = 297) were genotyped for CYP2D6 variants and assigned a 'score' based on predicted allele activities from 0 (no activity) to 2 (high activity). Correlation between CYP2D6 score and discontinuation rates at 4 months was tested. We observed a strong nonlinear correlation between higher CYP2D6 score and increased rates of discontinuation (r(2) = 0.935, P = 0.018). These data suggest that presence of active CYP2D6 alleles may predict for higher likelihood of tamoxifen discontinuation. Therefore, patients who may be most likely to benefit from tamoxifen may paradoxically be most likely to discontinue treatment prematurely. The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2009) 9, 258-264; doi: 10.1038/tpj.2009.14; published online 5 May 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据