4.2 Article

Active drug safety surveillance: a tool to improve public health

期刊

PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 1175-1182

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/pds.1668

关键词

drug safety; active surveillance; safety signals

资金

  1. CERTs cooperative grant [U18HS013474]
  2. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [1 UL1 RR024128-01]
  3. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Ensuring that drugs have an acceptable safety profile and are used safely is a major public health priority. The Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs) convened experts from academia, government, and industry to assess strategies to increase the speed and predictive value of generating and evaluating safety signals, and to identify next steps to improve the US system for identifying and evaluating potential safety signals. Methods The CERTs convened a think tank comprising representatives of the groups noted above to address these goals. Results Participants observed that, with the increasing availability of electronic health data, opportunities have emerged to more accurately characterize and confirm potential safety issues. The gain for public health from a highly coordinated network of population-based databases for active surveillance is great and within reach, although operational questions remain. A collaborative network must create a working definition of a safety signal, screening algorithms, and criteria and strategies to confirm or refute a signal once identified through screening. Guidelines are needed for when and how to communicate a signal exists and is being evaluated, as well as the outcome of that evaluation. Conclusion A public-private partnership to create a network of government and private databases to routinely evaluate and prioritize safety questions is in the public interest. Better methods are needed, and a knowledgeable workforce is required to conduct the surveillance and understand how to interpret the results. The international community will benefit from the availability of better methods and more experts. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据