4.5 Article

A Model for Targeting Colon Carcinoma Cells Using Single-Chain Variable Fragments Anchored on Virus-Like Particles via Glycosyl Phosphatidylinositol Anchor

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 2166-2177

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1316-4

关键词

large unilamellar vesicle; silkworm expression system; single-chain variable fragment; tumor-associated glycoprotein-72; virus-like particle

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. [22248009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

VLPs displaying tumor targeting single-chain variable fragments (VLP-rscFvs) which targets tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 (TAG-72) marker protein have a potential for immunotherapy against colon carcinoma tumors. In this study, scFvs anchored on VLPs using glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) were prepared to target colon carcinoma spheroids in vitro. VLPs-rscFvs were produced by co-injecting two types of Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV) bacmids, encoding RSV-gag and rscFvs cDNA into silkworm larvae. Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) of 100 nm in diameter were made using 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) and packaged with Sulforhodamine B (SRB). LUV-SRB was used to associate with VLP-rscFvs assisted by GP64 present on VLP-rscFvs to produce VLP-rscFv associated SRB (VLP-rscFvs-SRB) at pH 7.5. The antigenicity of the purified VLPs-rScFvs was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using TAG-72 as antigen. LUV-SRB made of DOPC was used to associate with 100 mu g of VLP-rscFvs to produce VLP-rscFv-SRB. Specific delivery and penetration of SRB up to 100 mu m into the spheroids shows the potential of the new model. The current study demonstrated the display, expression and purification of VLP-rscFvs efficiently. As a test model VLP-rscFv-SRB were prepared which can be used for immunotherapy. rscFvs provide the specificity needed to target tumors and VLPs serve as carrier transporting the dye to target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据