4.5 Article

Oxidized and Aggregated Recombinant Human Interferon Beta is Immunogenic in Human Interferon Beta Transgenic Mice

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 2393-2402

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-011-0451-4

关键词

antibodies; immunogenicity; oxidation; protein aggregates; recombinant human interferon beta

资金

  1. European Community [018926]
  2. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the effect of oxidation on the structure of recombinant human interferon beta-1a (rhIFN beta-1a) and its immunogenicity in wild-type and immune-tolerant transgenic mice. Untreated rhIFN beta-1a was degraded by metal-catalyzed oxidation, H2O2-mediated oxidation, and guanidine-mediated unfolding/refolding. Four rhIFN beta-1a preparations with different levels of oxidation and aggregation were injected intraperitoneally in mice 15x during 3 weeks. Both binding and neutralizing antibodies were measured. All rhIFN beta-1a preparations contained substantial amounts of aggregates. Metal-catalyzed oxidized rhIFN beta-1a contained high levels of covalent aggregates as compared with untreated rhIFN beta-1a. H2O2-treated rhIFN beta-1a showed an increase in oligomer and unrecovered protein content by HP-SEC; RP-HPLC revealed protein oxidation. Guanidine-treated rhIFN beta-1a mostly consisted of dimers and oligomers and some non-covalent aggregates smaller in size than those in untreated rhIFN beta-1a. All degraded samples showed alterations in tertiary protein structure. Wild-type mice showed equally high antibody responses against all preparations. Transgenic mice were discriminative, showing elevated antibody responses against both metal-catalyzed oxidized and H2O2-treated rhIFN beta-1a as compared to untreated and guanidine-treated rhIFN beta-1a. Oxidation-mediated aggregation increased the immunogenicity of rhIFN beta-1a in transgenic mice, whereas aggregated preparations devoid of measurable oxidation levels were hardly immunogenic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据