4.7 Article

Sensitivity of Podosphaera xanthii populations to anti-powdery-mildew fungicides in Spain

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 71, 期 10, 页码 1407-1413

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3943

关键词

cucurbits; multifungicide resistance; thiophanate-methyl; bupirimate; quinoxyfen; powdery mildews

资金

  1. Spanish 'Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN)' [AGL2007-65340-CO2-02/AGR, AGL2010-21848-CO2-01/AGR]
  2. FEDER funds (European Union)
  3. FPI programme of MICINN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDCucurbit powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera xanthii limits crop production in Spain, where disease control is largely dependent on fungicides. In previous studies, high levels of resistance to QoI and DMI fungicides were documented in south-central Spain. The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of P. xanthii populations to other fungicides and to provide tools for improved disease management. RESULTSUsing a leaf-disc assay, sensitivity to thiophanate-methyl, bupirimate and quinoxyfen of 50 isolates of P. xanthii was analysed to determine discriminatory concentrations between sensitive and resistant isolates. With the exception of thiophanate-methyl, no clearly different groups of isolates could be identified, and as a result, discriminatory concentrations were established on the basis of the maximum fungicide field application rate. Subsequently, a survey of P. xanthii resistance to these fungicides was carried out by testing a collection of 237 isolates obtained during the 2002-2011 cucurbit growing seasons. This analysis revealed very high levels of resistance to thiophanate-methyl (95%). By contrast, no resistance to bupirimate and quinoxyfen was found. CONCLUSIONResults suggest that thiophanate-methyl has become completely ineffective for controlling cucurbit powdery mildew in Spain. By contrast, bupirimate and quinoxyfen remain as very effective tools for cucurbit powdery mildew management. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据