4.7 Article

Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 67, 期 5, 页码 586-598

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2114

关键词

spray drift; spray application techniques; meteorological factors; field experiments; distribution of spray liquid fractions

资金

  1. Swedish Board of Agriculture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate spray drift from a conventional field sprayer as influenced by meteorological and technical factors, and to provide spray operators with data on which to base sound judgements when applying pesticides. The study was conducted in grazing fields and cereal crops. RESULTS: Interpreting the results from 15 field trials under varying meteorological conditions using different boom heights and driving speeds indicates that, during normal spraying conditions, the most decisive factors influencing the total spray drift (TSD) will be boom height and wind speed, followed by air temperature, driving speed and vapour pressure deficit. One important finding was that TSD (within the encompassed range of meteorological conditions and a boom height of 0.4 m) could be expressed as a simple function of the fraction of droplets <= 100 mu m. In cereal crops: TSD = 0.36 + 0.11 x [fr. (d <= 100 mu m)] and in grazing fields, TSD = 1.02 + 0.10 x [fr. (d <= 100 mu m)]. In most cases a fraction of the airborne drift passed over the 6 m sampling mast located 5 m downwind of the spray swath. CONCLUSIONS: Under specified conditions, the present results indicate a simple relation between the total spray drift and volume fractions of droplets <= 100 mu m. Given the nozzle type, it was concluded that the most decisive factors determining TSD are wind speed and boom height. Evaluating the relative importance of the meteorological and technical factors contributes to increasing knowledge in this field of research. (C) 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据