4.7 Article

Glyphosate-resistant horseweed made sensitive to glyphosate: low-temperature suppression of glyphosate vacuolar sequestration revealed by 31P NMR

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 67, 期 10, 页码 1215-1221

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2169

关键词

glyphosate; glyphosate resistance; in vivo P-31 NMR; Conyza canadensis; ABC transporter

资金

  1. Monsanto Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Horseweed has been the most invasive glyphosate-resistant (GR) weed, spreading to 16 states in the United States and found on five continents. The authors have previously reported that GR horseweed employs rapid vacuolar sequestration of glyphosate, presumably via a tonoplast transporter, substantively to reduce cytosolic glyphosate concentrations.(1) It was hypothesized that glyphosate sequestration was the herbicide resistance mechanism. If resistance is indeed endowed by glyphosate sequestration, suppression of sequestration offers the potential for controlling GR horseweed at normal herbicide field-use rates. RESULTS: Low-temperature P-31 NMR experiments performed in vivo with GR cold-acclimated horseweed showed markedly suppressed vacuolar accumulation of glyphosate even 3 days after glyphosate treatment. (In stark contrast, 85% of the visible glyphosate was sequestered 24 h after spraying warm-acclimated GR horseweed.) Cold-acclimated GR horseweed treated at normal use rates and maintained at low temperature succumbed to the lethal effects of glyphosate over a 40 day period. Treatment of GR horseweed in the field when temperatures were cooler showed the predicted positive herbicidal response. CONCLUSIONS: Low temperature markedly diminishes vacuolar sequestration of glyphosate in the GR horseweed biotype, yielding a herbicide response equivalent to that of the sensitive biotype. This supports the recent hypothesis' that glyphosate sequestration is the resistance mechanism employed by GR horseweed. C) 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据