4.5 Article

Extending Airborne Electromagnetic Surveys for Regional Active Layer and Permafrost Mapping with Remote Sensing and Ancillary Data, Yukon Flats Ecoregion, Central Alaska

期刊

PERMAFROST AND PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 184-199

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppp.1775

关键词

active-layer thickness; airborne electromagnetic; Alaska; cryosphere; permafrost; remote sensing

资金

  1. USGS Climate Land Use Research and Development Program
  2. USGS Climate Effects Network Yukon River Basin programme [G10PC00044, G08PC91508]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machine-learning regression tree models were used to extrapolate airborne electromagnetic resistivity data collected along flight lines in the Yukon Flats Ecoregion, central Alaska, for regional mapping of permafrost. This method of extrapolation (r=0.86) used subsurface resistivity, Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) at-sensor reflectance, thermal, TM-derived spectral indices, digital elevation models and other relevant spatial data to estimate near-surface (0-2.6-m depth) resistivity at 30-m resolution. A piecewise regression model (r=0.82) and a presence/absence decision tree classification (accuracy of 87%) were used to estimate active-layer thickness (ALT) (< 101cm) and the probability of near-surface (up to 123-cm depth) permafrost occurrence from field data, modelled near-surface (0-2.6m) resistivity, and other relevant remote sensing and map data. At site scale, the predicted ALTs were similar to those previously observed for different vegetation types. At the landscape scale, the predicted ALTs tended to be thinner on higher-elevation loess deposits than on low-lying alluvial and sand sheet deposits of the Yukon Flats. The ALT and permafrost maps provide a baseline for future permafrost monitoring, serve as inputs for modelling hydrological and carbon cycles at local to regional scales, and offer insight into the ALT response to fire and thaw processes. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据