3.9 Article

Theoretical and Experimental Approaches of Liquid Entry Pressure Determination in Membrane Distillation Processes

期刊

出版社

BUDAPEST UNIV TECHNOLOGY ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.3311/PPch.2179

关键词

liquid entry pressure; membrane distillation; microporous hydrophobic membrane; hollow fiber module; flat sheet module; wetting phenomena; regeneration of wetted pores

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane distillation (MD) is a thermally driven separation process that employs a hydrophobic membrane as a barrier for the liquid phase, allowing only vapor phase to pass through the membrane pores. Wetting of membrane pores by liquid streams (i.e. the loss of hydrophobic characteristics of membranes) is a crucial issue in MD treatment. This paper is organized into two parts. The first part provides an overview of the theoretical background of wetting phenomenon and guides the reader through the experimental techniques presented in the literature for determining liquid entry pressure (LEP) of MD membranes. In the second part, we provide experimentally measured data on LEP values of some commercially available hollow-fiber and fiat-sheet membranes tested in our lab using different MD configurations. The LEPw value of the MD 020 CP 2N hollow-fiber membrane (Microdyn-Nadir GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) made of PP is found to be 0.97 bar using direct-contact membrane distillation (DCMD) configuration. The LEPw value of the Durapore (TM) GVPH flat sheet membrane (Merck Millipore Inc., Billerica, USA) made of PVDF is found to be 2.37 +/- 0.025 bar. using static measurement technique and 1.90 bar using vacuum MD configuration. We also show that wetted membranes can be successfully regenerated by soaking them in ethanol and removing ethanol with evaporation at elevated temperatures. A novel concept of regeneration procedures applying vacuum have developed and have been proved to be effective for the tested flat sheet modules, however, failed on recovering the hydrophobic characteristics of the PP membrane in the hollow-fiber module.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据