4.4 Article

PACAP and a novel stable analog protect rat brain from ischemia: Insight into the mechanisms of action

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 1207-1216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.04.003

关键词

Stroke; Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP); Metabolically stable analog; Neuroprotection; Apoptosis; Inflammation

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. European Institute for Peptide Research [IFRMP23]
  3. FEDER
  4. ANR Jeune Chercheuse-Jeune Chercheur
  5. LARC-Neurosciences network
  6. Region Haute-Normandie
  7. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) shows potent protective effects in numerous models of neurological insults. However, the use of PACAP as a clinically efficient drug is limited by its poor metabolic stability. By combining identification of enzymatic cleavage sites with targeted chemical modifications, a metabolically stable and potent PACAP38 analog was recently developed. The neuroprotective activity of this novel compound was for the first time evaluated and compared to the native peptide using a rat model of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Our results show that as low as picomolar doses of PACAP38 and its analog strongly reduce infarct volume and improve neurological impairment induced by stroke. In particular, these peptides inhibit the expression of Bcl-2-associated death promoter, caspase 3, macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha, inducible nitric oxide synthase 2, tumor necrosis factor-a mRNAs, and increase extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2, B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 and interleukin 6 mRNA levels. These results indicate that the neuroprotective effect of PACAP after MCAO is not only due to its ability to inhibit a poptosis but also to modulate the inflammatory response. The present study highlights the potential therapeutic efficacy of very low concentrations of PACAP or its metabolically stable derivative for the treatment of stroke. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据