4.4 Article

High content analysis to determine cytotoxicity of the antimicrobial peptide, melittin and selected structural analogs

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1764-1773

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.06.006

关键词

Antimicrobial peptide; Cytotoxicity screening; High-content-analysis (HCA); Melittin; MTT assay

资金

  1. Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology, Science Foundation Ireland [07/SRC/B1154]
  2. Food for Health Ireland, Food Science Building, University College Cork [CC20080001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPS) are naturally occurring entities with potential as pharmaceutical candidates and/or food additives. They are present in many organisms including bacteria, insects, fish and mammals. While their antimicrobial activity is equipotent with many commercial antibiotics, current limitations are poor pharmacokinetics, stability and potential toxicology issues. Most elicit antimicrobial action via perturbation of bacterial membranes. Consequently, associated cytotoxicity in human cells is reflected by their capacity to lyse erythrocytes. However, more rigorous toxicological assessment of AMPs is required in order to predict potential failure at a later stage of development. We describe a high-content analysis (HCA) screening protocol recently established for determination and prediction of safety in pharmaceutical drug discovery. HCA is a powerful, multi-parameter bioanalytical tool that amalgamates the actions of fluorescence microscopy with automated cell analysis software in order to understand multiple changes in cellular health. We describe the application of HCA in assessing cytotoxicity of the cytolytic a-helical peptide, melittin, and selected structural analogs. The data shows that structural modification of melittin reduces its cytotoxic action and that HCA is suitable for rapidly identifying cytotoxicity. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据