4.4 Article

Structure-activity relationships of novel peptide agonists of the human bradykinin B2 receptor

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 777-787

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.12.003

关键词

Bradykinin; GPCR; Peptide agonists; Bioassays; Human

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Quebec
  3. Faculty of medicine of the Universite de Sherbrooke
  4. FRSQ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nonapeptide bradykinin (BK) is involved in the genesis of inflammation, edema and in pain mediation. As such, much effort has gone into the development of peptide/non-peptide antagonists to counteract these processes. However, there is an increasing awareness of the potential value of chemically stable BK agonists in the treatment of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. In this study, a structure-activity relationship study of BK was performed to develop potent and stable peptide mimetics active at the human B2 receptors (hB2R). Twenty-three analogues were produced with substitutions at positions 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 and/or 9 of BK. In vitro binding (on transiently transfected HEK-293T cells) and biological activities (vasomotricity tests on human umbilical veins, MAPK assays on HEK-293T cells) of novel BK peptide derivatives at hB2R were determined alongside with previously reported synthetic agonists (e.g. RMP-7, JMV1609, FR190997). Some peptides were also tested in vivo in rats and rabbits using blood pressure assays. Two compounds, [Hyp(3), Thi(5), Cha(8)]-BK and [Hyp(3), Thi(5), (N)Chg(7), Thi(8)]-BK, exhibited equivalent (or even greater) in vitro affinities and potencies to BK at the naturally expressed and recombinant hB2R Their potency and duration of action in vivo were highly superior to BK, thus inferring that they can withstand intravascular proteolysis. These novel compounds show promise as candidates for investigating the pharmacology of BK receptors and developing potential therapeutical applications. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据