4.7 Review

How do divergent ecological strategies emerge among marine bacterioplankton lineages?

期刊

TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 577-584

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.004

关键词

ecological strategy; life history; Alphaproteobacteria; Roseobacter; SAR11; genome streamlining

资金

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF538.01]
  2. National Science Foundation [OCE-1259562]
  3. Chinese University of Hong Kong [4930062, 4053105]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1356010] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterotrophic bacteria in pelagic marine environments are frequently categorized into two canonical ecological groups: patch-associated and free-living. This framework provides a conceptual basis for understanding bacterial utilization of oceanic organic matter. Some patch-associated bacteria are ecologically linked with eukaryotic phytoplankton, and this observation fits with predicted coincidence of their genome expansion with marine phytoplankton diversification. By contrast, free-living bacteria in today's oceans typically live singly with streamlined metabolic and regulatory functions that allow them to grow in nutrient-poor seawater. Recent analyses of marine Alphaproteobacteria suggest that some free-living bacterioplankton lineages evolved from patch-associated ancestors up to several hundred million years ago. While evolutionary analyses agree with the hypothesis that natural selection has maintained these distinct ecological strategies and genomic traits in present-day populations, they do not rule out a major role for genetic drift in driving ancient ecological switches. These two evolutionary forces may have acted on ocean bacteria at different geological time scales and under different geochemical constraints, with possible implications for future adaptations to a changing ocean. New evolutionary models and genomic data are leading to a more comprehensive understanding of marine bacterioplankton evolutionary history.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据