4.7 Article

Standardized Screening for Suicidal Adolescents in Primary Care

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 125, 期 5, 页码 938-944

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-2458

关键词

suicide; adolescent; screening; behavioral health; primary care

资金

  1. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To determine if brief standardized screening for suicide risk in pediatric primary care practices will increase detection rates of suicidal youth, maintain increased detection and referral rates, and be replicated in other practices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Physicians in 3 primary care practices received brief training in suicide risk, and 2 standardized questions were inserted into their existing electronic medical chart psychosocial interview. The questions automatically populated for all adolescents aged 12.0 to 17.9 years. Deidentified data were extracted during both intervention trials and for the same dates of the previous year. Referral rates were extracted from social work records. RESULTS: The rates of inquiry about suicide risk increased 219% (clinic A odds ratio [OR]: 2.04 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-2.51]; clinic B OR: 3.20 [95% CI: 2.69-3.71]; clinic C OR: 1.85 [95% CI: 1.38-2.31]). The rate of case detection increased in clinic A (OR: 4.99 [95% CI: 4.20-5.79]), was maintained over 6 months after the intervention began (OR: 4.38 [95% CI: 3.74-5.02]), and was replicated in both clinic B (OR: 5.46 [95% [CI: 3.36-7.56]) and clinic C (OR: 3.42 [95% CI: 2.33-4.52]). The increase in case detection was 392% across all 3 clinics. Referral rates of suicidal youth to outpatient behavioral health care centers increased at a rate equal to that of the detection rates. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized screening for suicide risk in primary care can detect youth with suicidal ideation and prompt a referral to a behavioral health care center before a fatal or serious suicide attempt is made. Pediatrics 2010;125:938-944

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据