4.6 Article

Vitamin D status among preterm and full-term infants at birth

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 75, 期 1, 页码 75-80

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.174

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gerber Foundation
  2. William F. Milton Fund
  3. Clinical Translational Science Award [UL1RR025758]
  4. Brigham and Women's Hospital from the National Center for Research Resources
  5. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD [U01 HL091528]
  6. Klarman Scholars Program at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  7. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH [K23 ES022242]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for maternal vitamin D deficiency and preterm birth overlap, but the distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels among preterm infants is not known. We aimed to determine the associations between 25(OH)D levels and gestational age. METHODS: We measured umbilical cord plasma levels of 25(OH)D from 471 infants born at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. We used generalized estimating equations to determine whether preterm (<37 wks' gestation) or very preterm (<32 wks' gestation) infants had greater odds of having 25(OH)D levels below 20 ng/ml than more mature infants. We adjusted for potential confounding by season of birth, maternal age, race, marital status, and singleton or multiple gestation. RESULTS: Mean cord plasma 25(OH)D level was 34.0 ng/ml (range: 4.1-95.3 and SD: 14.1). Infants born before 32 wk's gestation had increased odds of having 25(OH)D levels below 20 ng/ml in unadjusted (odds ratio (OR): 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CD: 1.1-4.3) and adjusted models (OR: 2.4; 95% Cl: 1.2-5.3) as compared with more mature infants. CONCLUSION: Infants born in <32 wks' gestation are at higher risk than more mature infants for low 25(OH)D levels. Further investigation of the relationships between low 25(OH)D levels and preterm birth and its sequelae is thus warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据