4.6 Article

Statins prevent adverse effects of postnatal glucocorticoid therapy on the developing brain in rats

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 74, 期 6, 页码 639-645

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.152

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. Fonds Internationalisering, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  4. British Heart Foundation [RG/11/16/29260, RG/06/006/22028] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Postnatal glucocorticoid therapy in the treatment of chronic lung disease benefits lung function, however it adversely affects brain development. We hypothesized that combined postnatal glucocorticoid and statin therapy diminishes adverse effects of glucocorticoids on the developing brain. METHODS: On postnatal days (P) 1-3, one male pup per litter received i.p. injections of saline (control (C), n = 13) or dexamethasone (0.5, 0.3, 0.1 mu g/g; D, n = 13), +/- pravastatin (10 mg/kg i.p.; CP, n = 12; DP, n = 15). Statins or saline continued from P4-6. At P21, brains were perfusion fixed for histological and stereological analyses. RESULTS: Relative to controls, dexamethasone reduced total (837 +/- 23 vs. 723 +/- 37), cortical (378 +/- 12 vs. 329 +/- 15), and deep gray matter (329 +/- 12 vs. 284 +/- 15) volume (mm(3)), cortical neuronal number (23 +/- 1 vs. 19 +/- 1 x 10(6)), and hippocampal neuronal soma volume (CA1: 1,206 +/- 32 vs. 999 +/- 32; dentate gyrus: 679 +/- 28 vs. 542 +/- 24 mu m(3); all P < 0.05). Dexamethasone increased the glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive astrocyte density in the white matter (96 +/- 2 vs. 110 +/- 4/0.1 mm(2)); P < 0.05. These effects no longer occurred in brains from pups treated with combined dexamethasone and pravastatin. Pravastatin alone had no effect on these variables. CONCLUSION: Concomitant dexamethasone with statins in premature infants may be safer for the developing brain than dexamethasone alone in the treatment of chronic lung disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据