4.6 Article

Sleep fragmentation and intermittent hypoxemia are associated with decreased insulin sensitivity in obese adolescent Latino males

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 293-298

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2012.73

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [HL090451, EB001978]
  2. University of Southern California Center for Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer [TREC U54 CA 116848]
  3. Children's Hospital Los Angeles General Clinical Research Center [M01 RR00047]
  4. National Center for Research Resources, NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Although sleep-related breathing disorder (SRBD) has been linked to insulin resistance in adults, this has not been as well established in children. We hypothesized that the severity of SRBD in adolescents was associated with metabolic impairment. METHODS: Polysomnography was performed on obese, Latino males referred for snoring. The frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test was used to assess glucose homeostasis. Total-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to quantify adiposity. RESULTS: A total of 22 males (mean age +/- SD: 13.4 +/- 2.1 y, BMI z-score 2.4 +/- 0.3, obstructive apnea hypopnea index 4.1 +/- 3.2) were studied. After correcting for age and adiposity in multiple-regression models, Log frequency of desaturation (defined as >= 3% drop in oxygen saturation from baseline) negatively correlated with insulin sensitivity. Sleep efficiency was positively correlated with glucose effectiveness (S-G, the capacity of glucose to mediate its own disposal). The Log total arousal index was positively correlated with Log homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance. CONCLUSION: Sleep fragmentation and intermittent hypoxemia are associated with metabolic impairment in obese adolescent Latino males independent of age and adiposity. We speculate that SRBD potentiates the risk for development of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes in the obese adolescent population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据