4.6 Article

Modeling Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Human Disease Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 10-18

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819009b0

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  2. The Hartwell Foundation
  3. The Twenty-five Club of Magee-Womens Hospital
  4. The National Institutes of Health [DK079806]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK079806] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an experimental system, Caenorhabditis elegans offers a unique opportunity to interrogate in vivo the genetic and molecular functions of human disease-related genes. For example. C. elegans has provided crucial insights into fundamental biologic processes, such as cell death and cell fate determinations, as well as pathologic processes Such as neurodegeneration and microbial susceptibility. The C. elegans model has several distinct advantages, including a completely sequenced genome that shares extensive homology with that of mammals, ease Of Cultivation and storage, a relatively short lifespan and techniques for generating null and transgenic animals. However, the ability to conduct unbiased forward and reverse genetic screens in C. elegans remains one of the most powerful experimental paradigms for discovering the biochemical pathways underlying human disease phenotypes. The identification of these pathways leads to a better understanding of the molecular interactions that perturb cellular physiology, and forms the foundation for designing mechanism-based therapies. To this end, the ability to process large numbers of isogenic animals through automated work stations suggests that C. elegans. manifesting different aspects of human disease phenotypes, will become the platform of choice for in vivo drug discovery and target validation using high-throughput/content screening technologies. (Pediatr Res 65: 10-18, 2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据