4.3 Article

Use of administrative and electronic health record data for development of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study

期刊

PEDIATRIC DIABETES
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 573-584

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12152

关键词

administrative data; case ascertainment; childhood diabetes; electronic health record; type classification

资金

  1. ALLCDC
  2. NCCDPHP [5U18DP002709-05, 5U18DP002708-03, 1U18DP002714-01, 561322, 604670] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  3. NCCDPHP
  4. ALLCDC [569696] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  5. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR001111, UL1 TR002489, UL1 TR000154, UL1 TR000083, UL1 TR001082, UL1 TR000423, UL1 TR000077, UL1 TR00423, UL1TR000083] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR025014, UL1 RR029882, UL1 RR026314, M01 RR000069, UL1RR029882] Funding Source: Medline
  7. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK57516, P30 DK017047, P30 DK057516] Funding Source: Medline
  8. HSRD VA [HIR 10-001] Funding Source: Medline
  9. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [DP-05069, U18 DP002709, DP-10001, U01 DP000248, U01 DP000250, 1U18DP002709, U18DP002714, U01 DP000246, U01 DP000254, U18 DP002708, U18DP002710-01, U18 DP002714, U01 DP000245, U01 DP000244, U18 DP002710, U01 DP000247] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe performance of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification may differ by demographic characteristics. ObjectiveThis study evaluated the potential of administrative and electronic health record (EHR) data from a large academic care delivery system to conduct diabetes case ascertainment in youth according to type, age, and race/ethnicity. SubjectsOf 57767 children aged <20yr as of 31 December 2011 seen at University of North Carolina Health Care System in 2011 were included. MethodsUsing an initial algorithm including billing data, patient problem lists, laboratory test results, and diabetes related medications between 1 July 2008 and 31 December 2011, presumptive cases were identified and validated by chart review. More refined algorithms were evaluated by type (type 1 vs. type 2), age (<10 vs. 10yr) and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White vs. other'). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated and compared. ResultsThe best algorithm for ascertainment of overall diabetes cases was billing data. The best type 1 algorithm was the ratio of the number of type 1 billing codes to the sum of type 1 and type 2 billing codes 0.5. A useful algorithm to ascertain youth with type 2 diabetes with other' race/ethnicity was identified. Considerable age and racial/ethnic differences were present in type-non-specific and type 2 algorithms. ConclusionsAdministrative and EHR data may be used to identify cases of childhood diabetes (any type), and to identify type 1 cases. The performance of type 2 case ascertainment algorithms differed substantially by race/ethnicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据