4.4 Article

Potential role of ventricular tumor markers in CNS germ cell tumors

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 1647-1650

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24620

关键词

alpha-fetoprotein; cerebrospinal fluid; germ cell tumor; germinoma; human chorionic gonadotropin; tumor marker

资金

  1. Making Headway Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background There is increasing reliance on oncoprotein assays such as the -subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (-hCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for diagnosis or confirmation of histology of central nervous system (CNS) germ cell tumors (GCT), but the relative diagnostic sensitivity and reliability of assays from serum (S), lumbar (L), and ventricular (V) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are uncertain. Procedure A total of 86 patients with CNS GCT were identified from our database. Fourteen patients had contemporaneous -hCG and/or AFP measurements from serum, ventricular, and lumbar CSF at diagnosis (n=13) or relapse (n=1), constituting the subjects for this report. Their primary tumor sites were: pineal (n=8), suprasellar (n=1), or both (n=5). Their mean age at diagnosis was 16.0 years (range 9.1-25.9). The male:female sex ratio was 13:1. Results For the germinoma-treated patients (n=8), the median (range) -hCG values (S, V, L) were 0 (0-6.9), 7.0 (0-57.4), 8.3 (0-34.0) mIU/ml. For patients managed as mixed malignant GCT (MMGCT) (n=6), the median (range) -hCG values (S, V, L) were 3.9 (0-58.0), 3.6 (0-147.0), 61.8 (0-358.0) mIU/ml. The median (range) AFP values were 7.5 (0-27,400.0), 2.0 (0-2,981.0), 3.0 (0-14,015.0) ng/ml. Lumbar CSF -hCG values were equal or greater than those in ventricular CSF or serum in 12 of 13 cases (92.3%). All patients with MMGCT had lumbar AFP equal or greater than the ventricular CSF values, while serum AFP values remained highest. Conclusions Ventricular CSF values cannot be considered a replacement for lumbar CSF. Lumbar CSF is the most reliable source of tumor markers to establish baseline and follow-up diagnostic endpoints. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013;60:1647-1650. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据