4.4 Article

Initial testing (stage 1) of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor SCH 727965 (dinaciclib) by the pediatric preclinical testing program

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 59, 期 7, 页码 1266-1274

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24073

关键词

developmental therapeutics; dinaciclib; preclinical testing; SCH 727965

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [NO1-CM-42216, CA21765, CA108786]
  2. Schering-Plough [SCH 727965]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background SCH 727965 is a novel drug in clinical development that potently and selectively inhibits CDK1, CDK2, CDK5, and CDK9. The activity of SCH 727965 was evaluated against the PPTP's in vitro and in vivo panels. Procedures SCH 727965 was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel using 96?hours exposure at concentrations ranging from 0.1?nM to 1.0 mu M. It was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at a dose of 40?mg/kg administered intraperitoneally twice weekly for 2 weeks and repeated at Day 21 with a total observation period of 6 weeks. Results The median IC50 value for the cell lines was 7.5?nM, with less than fourfold range between the minimum (3.4?nM) and maximum (11.2?nM) IC50 values. SCH 727965 demonstrated an activity pattern consistent with cytotoxicity for most of the cell lines. Forty-three xenograft models were studied and SCH 727965 induced significant delays in event free survival distribution compared to control in 23 of 36 (64%) evaluable solid tumor xenografts and in 3 of 7 ALL xenografts. SCH 727965 did not induce objective responses in the solid tumor panels and the best response observed was stable disease for one osteosarcoma xenograft. In the leukemia panel, there were two objective responses with a complete response observed in a single xenograft. Conclusions SCH 727965 shows an interesting pattern of activity suggesting its potential applicability against selected childhood cancers, particularly leukemias. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 59: 12661274.(C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据