4.4 Article

Twenty-Five Year Follow-Up of Childhood Wilms Tumor: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 57, 期 7, 页码 1210-1216

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.23090

关键词

late effects; survivorship; Wilms tumor

资金

  1. NCI [U24 CA55727]
  2. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Treatment cures over 90% of children with Wilms tumor (WT) who subsequently risk late morbidity and mortality. This study describes the 25-year outcomes of 5-year WT survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS). Procedure. The CCSS, a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study, assessed WT survivors (N = 1,256), diagnosed 1970-1986, for chronic health conditions, health status, health care utilization, socioeconomic status, subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs), and mortality compared to the US population and a sibling cohort (N = 4,023). Results. The cumulative incidence of all and severe chronic health conditions was 65.4% and 24.2% at 25 years. Hazard ratios (HR) were 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.3 for grades 1-4 and 4.7, 95% CI 3.6-6.1 for grades 3 and 4, compared to sibling group. WT survivors reported more adverse general health status than the sibling group (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.4), but mental health status, socioeconomic outcome, and health care utilization were similar. The cumulative incidence of SMN was 3.0% (95% CI 1.9-4.0%) and of mortality was 6.1% (95% CI 4.77.4%). Radiation exposure increased the likelihood of congestive heart failure (CHF) (no doxorubicin-HR 6.6; 95% CI 1.6-28.3; doxorubicin <= 250 mg/m(2)-HR 13.0; 95% CI 1.9-89.7; doxorubicin >250 mg/m(2)-HR 18.3; 95% CI 3.8-88.2), SMN (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 9.0; 95% CI 3.9-17.7 with and 4.9; 95% CI 1.8-10.6 without doxorubicin) and death. Conclusion. Long-term survivors of WT treated from 1970 to 1986 are at increased risk of treatment related morbidity and mortality 25 years from diagnosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;57:1210-1216. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据