4.6 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Mechanisms of nanosized titanium dioxide-induced testicular oxidative stress and apoptosis in male mice (Retracted article. See vol. 12, 23, 2015)

期刊

PARTICLE AND FIBRE TOXICOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12989-014-0047-3

关键词

Titanium dioxide nanoparticles; Testis; Oxidative stress; Sertoli cell apoptosis; Gene expression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81473007, 81273036, 30901218]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology and Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Due to the increased application of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) in the food industry and daily life, their potential toxic effects in humans and animals have been investigated. However, very few studies have focused on testicular oxidative stress and/or apoptosis. Methods: In order to understand the possible molecular mechanisms of testicular lesions following exposure to TiO2 NPs, male mice were exposed to 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg body weight TiO2 NPs for 90 consecutive days. Testicular oxidative stress and apoptosis were then evaluated, and the testicular mRNA expression of several genes and their proteins involved in oxidative stress and/or apoptosis was investigated. Results: TiO2 NPs entered Sertoli cells and caused severe testicular oxidative damage and/or apoptosis, accompanied by excessive production of reactive oxygen species and peroxidation of lipids, proteins and DNA as well as a significant reduction in antioxidant capacity. Furthermore, exposure to TiO2 NPs resulted in the up-regulation of caspase-3, Nrbp2, and cytochrome c expression, and caused down-regulation of SOD, CAT, GPx, GST, GR, Cyp1b1, Car3, Bcl-2, Acaa2, and Axud1 expression in mouse testis. Conclusions: TiO2 NPs entered Sertoli cells via the blood-testis barrier and were deposited in mouse seminiferous cord and/or Sertoli cells, causing oxidative damage and apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据