4.5 Article

Genetic analysis of NFE2L2 promoter variation in Taiwanese Parkinson's disease

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 247-250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.10.018

关键词

Antioxidant response element; Oxidative stress; Parkinson's disease; Polymorphism; Disease association

资金

  1. National Science Council, Executive Yuan [NSC100-2325-B-003-001, NSC 99-2628-B-182A-063-MY3]
  2. National Taiwan Normal University [NTNU100-D-02]
  3. Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan [CMRPG3B138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress has been reported as one of the pathogeneses of Parkinson's disease (PD). Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of the target genes involved in antioxidant pathway. The promoter polymorphisms of the Nrf2-encoding gene, NFE2L2, have been shown to affect the promoter activity. Inconsistent findings of the associations between NFE2L2 promoter polymorphisms and PD have been reported in a multiple candidate gene study, a whole-genome association study, and a case-control study in multiple ethnicity groups. This study enrolled a total of 1006 individuals composed of 480 PD patients and 526 controls to evaluate if there was an association of the NFE2L2 promoter polymorphisms with PD susceptibility in the Taiwan population. Three promoter single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs35652124, rs6706649, and rs6721961 were examined using polymerase chain reaction and restriction analysis. The associations of each of the SNPs and the haplotypes constructed by the variations with PD susceptibility were examined. In spite of adequate statistic power, we observe no association of the three SNPs and their haplotypes with PD in a Taiwanese population. One of the reasons for the association disparity may include the genomic differences in ethnicities and environmental factors in different geographical regions. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据