4.5 Article

Factors associated with the effect of pramipexole on symptoms of idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 153-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.08.010

关键词

REM sleep behavior disorder; Pramipexole; REM sleep without atonia; Clonazepam; Parkinson's disease; Treatment responsiveness

资金

  1. Intramural Research Grant for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP [21B-4]
  2. Fellowship for Young Clinical Sleep Researchers of Japanese Society of Sleep Research
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24791235] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The clinical effectiveness of pramipexole (PPX), a candidate treatment for idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), varies among individuals. This study investigates factors associated with PPX effectiveness for treating RBD symptoms. Methods: Ninety-eight consecutive patients with RBD who had taken PPX or clonazepam (CNZP) for more than three months were enrolled. Factors associated with PPX effectiveness were examined: the ratio of REM sleep without atonia to total REM sleep (RWA/REM), length of RBD morbidity, frequency of vocalization or abnormal behavior, and Sniffin' Stick Test scores. These factors were also compared among the responders to PPX monotherapy, CNZP monotherapy, and PPX + CNZP combined therapy. Results: PPX was efficacious in 61.7% (50/81) of the subject patients. RWA/REM was associated with PPX effectiveness. The cut-off rate of RWA/REM for predicting PPX effectiveness was estimated as 16.8%. Responders to PPX + CNZP combined therapy showed significantly higher RWA/REM and frequency of vocalization or dream enactment behavior than either responders to monotherapy with PPX or to CNZP. Conclusion: PPX is probably applicable as an alternative to CNZP, especially for mild iRBD cases with a lower rate of RWA. Results of this study suggest that dopaminergic dysfunction can play a role in iRBD pathophysiology. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据