4.2 Article

Spontaneous cystogenesis in vitro of a Brazilian strain of Toxoplasma gondii

期刊

PARASITOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 181-188

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2012.12.003

关键词

Toxoplasma gondii; Bradyzoite; Recombinant strain; Stage conversion; Ultrastructure; Cyst

资金

  1. CAPES funding agency
  2. CNPq funding agency
  3. FAPERJ funding agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conversion of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites to the bradyzoite stage and tissue cyst formation in the life cycle of the parasite have crucial roles in the establishment of chronic toxoplasmosis. In this work we investigated the in vitro cystogenesis and behavior of the EGS strain, isolated from human amniotic fluid. We observed that tachyzoites of the EGS strain converted to intracellular cysts spontaneously in LLC-MK2 epithelial cells, HSFS fibroblasts and C6 glial cell lineage. The peak of conversion occurred in the LLC-MK2 cells after 4 days of infection, when 72.3 +/- 15.9 of the infected cells contained DBA positive cysts. Using specific markers against bradyzoite, tachyzoite and cyst wall components, we confirmed stage conversion and distinguished immature from mature cysts. It was also observed that the deposition of cyst wall components occurred before the total conversion of parasites. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed the fully conversion of parasites presenting the typical characteristics of bradyzoites as the posterior position of the nucleus and the presence of amylopectin granules. A thick cyst wall was also detected. Besides, the scanning microscopy revealed that the intracyst matrix tubules were shorter than those from the parasitophorous vacuole intravacuolar network and were immersed in a granular electron dense material. The EGS strain spontaneously forms high burden of cysts in cell culture without artificial stress conditions, and constitutes a useful tool to study this stage of the T. gondii life cycle. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据