4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Occurrence of Schistosoma bovis on Pemba Island, Zanzibar: implications for urogenital schistosomiasis transmission monitoring

期刊

PARASITOLOGY
卷 145, 期 13, 页码 1727-1731

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182018001154

关键词

Bulinus; cattle; Pemba; Schistosoma bovis; Schistosoma haematobium; schistosomiasis; schistosomes; snails; Zanzibar

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research (LCNTDR)
  3. University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc.
  4. Wellcome Trust [WT104958MA]
  5. Natural History Museum's Departmental Investment Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The causative agent of urogenital schistosomiasis, Schistosoma haematobium, was thought to be the only schistosome species transmitted through Bulinus snails on Unguja and Pemba Island (Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania). For insights into the environmental risk of S. haematobium transmission on Pemba Island, malacological surveys collecting Bulinus globosus and B. nasutus, two closely related potential intermediate hosts of S. haematobium were conducted across the island in November 2016. Of 1317 B. globosus/B. nasutus collected, seven B. globosus, identified through sequencing a DNA region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (cox1), were observed with patent infections assumed to be S. haematobium. However, when the collected cercariae were identified through sequencing a region of the cox1 and the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS1 + 2), schistosomes from five of these B. globosus collected from a single locality were in fact S. bovis. The identified presence of S. bovis raises concerns for animal health on Pemba, and complicates future transmission monitoring of S. haematobium. These results show the pertinence for not only sensitive, but also species-specific markers to be used when identifying cercariae during transmission monitoring, and also provide the first molecular confirmation for B. globosus transmitting S. bovis in East Africa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据