4.3 Article

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase Affects the Aggressiveness of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms Through Foxp3+CD4+CD25+ T Cells in Peripheral Blood

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 130-134

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182575e4a

关键词

intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN); regulatory T cell; Foxp3; indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO)

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24791426, 23791488] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) have a high malignant potential. We previously reported that peripheral Foxp3(+)CD4(+)CD25(+) T-cell (Foxp3(+) Treg) populations significantly increase with IPMN pathological aggressiveness. Dendritic cell-mediated induction of active Tregs from naive CD4(+) T cells requires indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). Here, we evaluated whether an IDO-Foxp3(+) Treg interaction plays a role in IPMN pathological aggressiveness. Methods: We evaluated peripheral blood samples and resected specimens from 12 patients with IPMN. We analyzed Foxp3(+)CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in peripheral blood by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, evaluated the resected specimens by anti-IDO antibody staining, and compared them with the patients' clinicopathological factors. Results: The pathological aggressiveness of IPMN was significantly associated with the number of peripheral Foxp3(+) Tregs (P < 0.05) and IDO-positive cells per high-power field (HPF) (P < 0.01). There was a significant correlation between the numbers of peripheral Foxp3(+) Tregs and IDO-positive cells/HPF (r = 0.625, P < 0.01). Patients with 7 or more IDO-positive cells/HPF had a significantly higher recurrence rate than those with less than 7 IDO-positive cells/HPF (P < 0.01, log-rank test). Conclusions: Peripheral Foxp3(+) Tregs accurately reflect the aggressiveness of IPMNs. An increase in Foxp3(+) Tregs can be induced by local IDO-positive cells in IPMN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据