4.2 Article

TAXONOMIC AND ECOLOGIC PERSISTENCE ACROSS THE ONSET OF THE LATE PALEOZOIC ICE AGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE UPPER MISSISSIPPIAN (CHESTERIAN SERIES), ILLINOIS BASIN, UNITED STATES

期刊

PALAIOS
卷 26, 期 1-2, 页码 5-17

出版社

SEPM-SOC SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2010.p10-013r

关键词

-

资金

  1. Geological Society of America
  2. American Museum of Natural History
  3. Paleontological Society
  4. Penn State Department of Geosciences
  5. Chevron Student Scholarship
  6. National Science Foundation [EAR-0236489]
  7. NASA [NNX07AK64G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The late Paleozoic ice age (LPIA) began in the Mississippian period (Visean-Serpukhovian) and is associated with a global mass extinction. This study examines hew the development of high-amplitude glacioeustasy at the start of the LPIA affected the taxonomic richness and ecologic diversity of tropical marine macro-invertebrate assemblages from the Illinois Basin (United States). Rarefaction and faunal turnover analyses reveal that regional taxonomic and guild richness persist nearly unchanged across the inferred onset of the LPIA and through multiple glacioeustatic cycles spanning a total duration of similar to 3 to 5 myr. In addition, low levels of taxonomic turnover characterize the LPIA transition and subsequent glacioeustatic cycles; 76% to 92% of pre-LPIA taxa persist into the ice age where they account for 63% to 75% of L PIA taxa. Thus, the onset of high-amplitude glacioeustasy was not a main driver of regional biotic change or extinction in the Illinois Basin at the start of the LPIA. Potential mechanisms for the regional persistence of taxonomic diversity and faunal composition despite major glacioeustasy include habitat tracking and an immigration rescue effect, where localized extinction is balanced by immigration of taxa from nearby areas. Finally, evidence from this and other studies of late Paleozoic faunal turnover suggest that persistence, not change, is the normal biotic response to high-amplitude glacioeustasy during the LPIA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据