4.7 Article

Glacial to deglacial ventilation and productivity changes in the southern Okhotsk Sea

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.12.013

关键词

Okhotsk Sea; Ventilation; Productivity; Glacial-deglacial change

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science-and Technology (JAMSTEC)
  2. Japan-Society for the Promotion of Science [18101001]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24651019, 18101001] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a source region of North Pacific Intermediate Water, the Okhotsk Sea plays an important role in the ventilation of the North Pacific. To understand the detailed oceanographic changes in this marginal sea since the last glaciation, we studied decadal to centennial scale proxy records from new sediment cores from the southwestern Okhotsk Sea. Glacial to Holocene Delta C-14 records of benthic foraminiferal shells suggested enhanced ventilation in the Okhotsk Sea during the early deglacial period between 18 and 15 ka, corresponding to Heinrich Event 1. Although the Delta C-14 reconstruction has considerable uncertainties, the Okhotsk Sea may have acted as a source for vigorous ventilation of the subarctic Pacific during this period. CaCO3 preservation events appear to be better explained by the ventilation history of the Okhotsk Sea than by coccolithophores and foraminifera production. CaCO3 preservation started to improve during 18 to 15 ka, and pronounced peaks in the CaCO3 content corresponded to the Bolling-Allerod (15 to 13 ka) and Preboreal (11.5 to 10 ka) warm periods. Diatom and coccolithophore productivity remained low in the Okhotsk Sea throughout the glacial to deglacial periods, different from the situation in the open subarctic Pacific, where high productivity was observed during the Bolling-Allerod period. After the Preboreal period, biogenic opal gradually increased and delta N-15 decreased in the southern Okhotsk Sea, suggesting that productivity was enhanced by a relaxation of the nitrate limitation. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据