4.7 Article

Reconstructing El Nino-Southern Oscillation activity and ocean temperature seasonality from short-lived marine mollusk shells from Peru

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.12.014

关键词

Eastern tropical Pacific; ENSO; Paleoclimate; Sea surface temperature; Mollusk; Stable isotopes

资金

  1. Joint Institute for the Study of Atmosphere and Ocean
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [NSF-ATM-0811382]
  3. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA-NA08OAR4310685]
  4. ANR research project EL PASO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A critical need exists for quantitative reconstructions of long-term El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variability in the eastern tropical Pacific. Presented here is a method to quantitatively estimate past changes 1) in the seasonal amplitude of sea surface temperature (SST) in the Peruvian coastal upwelling system and 2) in the amplitude of ENSO-related interannual variability in the eastern tropical Pacific. The seasonal amplitude of SST (Delta T) along the length of the Peruvian coast is strongly correlated with the Nino1 + 2 index. We show that the frequency distribution of Delta T values provided by a modern sample of 13 Mesodesma donacium shells faithfully reflects modern ENSO variability at the regional scale, including the range of anomalies from La Nina to moderate El Nino events, but excludes extreme warm anomalies because of high shell mortality. We propose to use the frequency distribution of ENSO anomalies in paleoclimate studies for comparisons between shell records, coral records, and GCM simulations. Reconstruction uncertainties can be quantified using Monte Carlo simulations. The method presented here opens new perspectives for quantitative paleo-ENSO reconstructions in the Eastern Pacific since it may be applied with any mollusk species from Peru provided at least one annual cycle of SST is faithfully recorded by shell delta O-18. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据