4.7 Article

Coastal-plain origin of trace-fossil bearing red beds in the Early Permian of Southern New Mexico, USA

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.10.041

关键词

Continental ichnology; Lagerstatte; Coastal floodplain; Late Paleozoic; North America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Early Permian Robledo Mountains Formation of the Hueco Group in the Robledo Mountains, south-central New Mexico, U.S.A., is a world-class ichnofossil Lagerstatte of supposed peritidal origin. Abundant and diverse invertebrate and vertebrate trace fossils occur in several thin horizons of siliciclastic red beds that are intercalated with thick successions of shallow marine limestone and shale. The depositional environment of the red beds has been discussed for decades but without any detailed sedimentary facies analysis. A recently completed systematic excavation shows that the majority of trace fossils is related to mud-draped surfaces within distal crevasse-splay siltstone to fine-grained sandstone. Interbedded mudstone with well-preserved macrofloral remains and a lungfish aestivation burrow represents a hitherto disregarded fades in overbank fines. Both environmental subzones were at least loosely covered with low-growing plants and experienced common periods of subaerial exposure. None of the physical and biological structures recorded in the measured section indicates tidal influence, but instead they support the reconstruction of a freshwater ecosystem dominated by arthropods and tetrapods. Given their proximity to carbonates of unambiguous subtidal origin, we propose that the trace-fossil-bearing red beds of the Robledo Mountains Formation formed in distal parts of an extensive coastal floodplain during alternating wet and dry conditions. If this interpretation is correct, it provides an impetus to continue ichnological and sedimentological field research in the study area, because the true tidal-flat ichnoguilds still await elucidation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据