4.4 Article

Yoga for Chronic Neck Pain: A 12-Month Follow-Up

期刊

PAIN MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 541-548

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/pme.12053

关键词

Yoga; Complementary Therapies; Neck Pain; Long-Term Effects; Regression Analysis

资金

  1. Karl and Veronica Carstens Foundation, Essen, Germany
  2. Veronica Carstens Foundation, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To assess the effects of a 9-week yoga intervention on chronic nonspecific neck pain 12 months after completion. Design Twelve-month follow-up of the pooled data of both arms of a randomized, controlled trial. Setting Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine at an academic teaching hospital. Subjects Fifty-one patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain (mean age 47.8 years; 82.4% female). Interventions A 9-week yoga group intervention. Outcome Measures Neck pain intensity (100-mm visual analog scale), functional disability (neck disability index), health-related quality of life (short-form 36 questionnaire, SF-36), generic disability (days with restricted activities), and global improvement. Results From baseline to 12-month follow-up, pain intensity improved from 48.81 +/- 17.71 to 32.31 +/- 20.68 (P<0.001), neck-related disability decreased from 25.26 +/- 9.02 to 19.49 +/- 11.52 (P=0.001), and bodily pain in the SF-36 improved from 49.37 +/- 12.40 to 59.26 +/- 17.57 (P=0.005). Improvements in pain intensity were predicted by weekly minutes of yoga practice during the past 4 weeks (r2=0.12, P=0.028); improved neck-related disability (r2=0.24, P=0.001) and bodily pain (r2=0.26, P=0.006) were predicted by regular yoga practice during the past 12 months. Generic disability did not decrease significantly. Twenty-four patients (68.6%) rated their health as at least somewhat improved. Conclusions A 9-week yoga intervention improved pain and neck-related disability for at least 12 months after completion. Sustained yoga practice seems to be the most important predictor of long-term effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据