4.4 Review

Time to Take Stock: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Analgesic Treatment Disparities for Pain in the United States

期刊

PAIN MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 150-174

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01310.x

关键词

Pain; DisparitiesuEthnic; DisparitiesuRacial; Pain Management; Pain Treatment; Opioids; Analgesics; The Joint Commission; United States

资金

  1. Pricara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The recent Institute of Medicine Report assessing the state of pain care in the United States acknowledged the lack of consistent data to describe the nature and magnitude of unrelieved pain and identify subpopulations with disproportionate burdens. Objectives. We synthesized 20 years of cumulative evidence on racial/ethnic disparities in analgesic treatment for pain in the United States. Evidence was examined for the 1) magnitude of association between race/ethnicity and analgesic treatment; 2) subgroups at an increased risk; and 3) the effect of moderators ( pain type, setting, study quality, and data collection period) on this association. Methods. United States studies with at least one explicit aim or analysis comparing analgesic treatment for pain between Whites and a minority group were included ( SciVerse Scopus database, 19892011). Results. Blacks/African Americans experienced both a higher number and magnitude of disparities than any other group in the analyses. Opioid treatment disparities were ameliorated for Hispanics/ Latinos for traumatic/surgical pain ( P = 0.293) but remained for non- traumatic/nonsurgical pain ( odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64- 0.77, P = 0.000). For Blacks/African Americans, opioid prescription disparities were present for both types of pain and were starker for non- traumatic/nonsurgical pain ( OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.59- 0.75, P = 0.000). In subanalyses, opioid treatment disparities for Blacks/African Americans remained consistent across pain types, settings, study quality, and data collection periods. Conclusion. Our study quantifies the magnitude of analgesic treatment disparities in subgroups of minorities. The size of the difference was sufficiently large to raise not only normative but quality and safety concerns. The treatment gap does not appear to be closing with time or existing policy initiatives. A concerted strategy is needed to reduce pain care disparities within the larger quality of care initiatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据