4.6 Article

Sex similarities and differences in pain-related periaqueductal gray connectivity

期刊

PAIN
卷 153, 期 2, 页码 444-454

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.006

关键词

Amygdala; Functional connectivity; Gender; Periaqueductal gray (PAG); Psychophysiological interaction; Sex difference

资金

  1. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)
  2. Swedish Society for Medical Research (SSMF)
  3. Ev. Studienwerk Villigst (Schwerte, Germany)
  4. SSMF
  5. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS)
  6. National Center for Complimentary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) [PO1-AT002048, KO1AT003883, R21AT004497, R01AT006364, R01AT005280, R21AT00949]
  7. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [R03AT218317]
  8. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [M01-RR-01066, UL1 RR025758-01, P41RR14075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated sex similarities and differences in pain-related functional connectivity in 60 healthy subjects. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and psychophysiological interaction analysis to investigate how exposure to low vs high experimental pain modulates the functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray (PAG). We found no sex differences in pain thresholds, and in both men and women, the PAG was more functionally connected with the somatosensory cortex, the supplemental motor area, cerebellum, and thalamus during high pain, consistent with anatomic predictions. Twenty-six men displayed a pain-induced increase in PAG functional connectivity with the amygdala caudate and putamen that was not observed in women. In an extensive literature search, we found that female animals have been largely overlooked when the connections between the PAG and the amygdala have been described, and that women are systematically understudied with regard to endogenous pain inhibition. Our results emphasize the importance of including both male and female subjects when studying basic mechanisms of pain processing, and point toward a possible sex difference in endogenous pain inhibition. (C) 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据