4.3 Article

Antibiotics potentially used in response to bioterrorism and the risk of major congenital malformations

期刊

PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 18-28

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00978.x

关键词

teratology; maternal medication; antibiotic exposure; congenital malformations

资金

  1. Food and Drug Administration [FDA 223-02-3003]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  3. Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics [HS1-0384]
  4. [R01 HD046595]
  5. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD046595] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was designed to assess the association between pregnancy-related exposures to antibiotics recommended for use in the event of a bioterrorism attack and major congenital malformations. A retrospective cohort study included 30 049 infants from Tennessee Medicaid born between 1985 and 2000 identified from computerised state databases. Infants with fetal exposures to ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, doxycycline and amoxicillin (antibiotics recommended for potential bioterrorism attacks) (n = 24 521) and erythromycin (included as a positive control) (n = 2128) were compared with infants with no fetal exposure to any antibiotics (n = 3400). Major congenital malformations identified from computerised records were confirmed through medical record review. Overall, 869 (2.9%) of infants in the cohort had a confirmed major congenital malformation, with major malformations ranging from 2.5% to 3.0% among the antibiotic-specific exposure groups. No increased risk was present in multivariable analyses for any malformations and for malformations of specific organ systems. In conclusion, these data suggest that ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, doxycycline or amoxicillin use by pregnant women should not result in a greater incidence of overall major congenital malformations in infants whose mothers take these medications, though a large increase in risk cannot be ruled out.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据