4.1 Article

Adolescents with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: A Patient and Parent Perspective

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03229.x

关键词

implantable cardioverter defibrillators; adolescent; sudden cardiac death; qualitative research

资金

  1. NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a device used in the treatment of individuals with life-threatening cardiac conditions. These include genetic disorders such as long QT syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome, all of which have the propensity to cause sudden cardiac death. Adults with ICDs consistently report elevated levels of anxiety and depression, as well as negative lifestyle changes associated with the device. Compared to older ICD recipients, young patients face decades of life with the device and the long-term impact and implications are important to consider. This research explores the experiences of adolescents living with an ICD. Parents of these adolescents were also included to explore the impact on them as the primary caregivers. Methods: A qualitative approach was chosen to explore the lived experience; semistructured interviews with six adolescents and six parents were conducted from which a number of key themes emerged. Results: The experiences described by participants included the restrictions adolescents face, the ICD shock experience, and ongoing challenges post-ICD implantation. However, both adolescents and parents were able to adjust to life after receiving an ICD and described several benefits associated with having the device. Findings also emerged relating to communication between health professionals and adolescents, and the limitations adolescents impose on themselves post-ICD implantation. Conclusion: These findings have important implications for clinical practice and may help guide medical management for adolescents with ICDs and their families. (PACE 2012; 35:62-72)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据