4.6 Article

Differences in the mechanism of blood clot formation and nanostructure in infants and children compared with adults

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 136, 期 6, 页码 1303-1309

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.10.034

关键词

Child; Fibrin; Scanning electron microscopy; Thrombin; Tissue plasminogen activator

资金

  1. Netherlands Heart Foundation
  2. Victorian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Infants and children have a lower incidence of thrombosis compared with adults. Yet, the mechanism of blood clot formation and structure in infants and children, as the end product of coagulation, has not been studied. This study aimed to establish differences in the mechanism of thrombin generation, fibrin clot formation and response to thrombolysis in infants and children compared with adults. Materials and methods: We studied thrombin generation, fibrin clot formation, structure and fibrinolysis in healthy infants, children and adults. Results: Younger populations had a decreased potential to generate thrombin, at a slower velocity compared with adults, correlating positively with age. Clot formation at venous shear rate was decreased in infants and children compared with adults, with increased time for fibrin formation, decreased fibrin formation velocity, resulting in decreased tendency for fibrin formation in younger populations. These differences were less pronounced at arterial shear rate. Studies of the fibrin clot structure in paediatric age groups showed a significantly larger pore size compared with adults, suggestive of a clot that is less resistant to fibrinolysis. The presence of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) resulted in a significant decrease in the pore size of infants and children, but not in adults. Conclusions: This is the first study to suggest that the mechanism of blood clot formation and nanostructure, as well as response to thrombolytic therapy is different in infants and children compared with adults. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据