4.6 Article

In-situ investigation of interfacial effects on charge accumulation and extraction in organic solar cells based on transient photocurrent studies

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 1624-1630

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.04.019

关键词

Organic solar cell; Transient photocurrent; Interfacial dipole; Charge accumulation; Charge recombination

资金

  1. National Significant Program [2014CB643506, 2013CB922104]
  2. International Cooperation and Exchange Program [21161160445]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61205034]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20110491143]
  5. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1102011] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In organic solar cells, the interfacial and bulk photovoltaic processes are typically coupled based on charge transport and accumulation. In this article, we demonstrated that the in situ transient photocurrent measurements can be a powerful approach to separately investigate the interfacial effects on interfacial and bulk photovoltaic process. Based on this method, the effects of interfacial dipoles on charge extraction, accumulation, and recombination are solely studied by comparing Ca and Al devices with standard architecture of ITO/PEDOT/P3HT:PCBM/cathode. We observe that stronger interfacial dipoles can significantly decrease the charge extraction time and consequently increase the charge extraction efficiency. More importantly, stronger interfacial dipoles can also decrease the charge accumulation within the bulk photovoltaic layer. Furthermore, our experimental results indicate that the bulk-accumulated charges can act as recombination centers under device-operating condition, resulting in the recombination loss in photogenerated carriers. Clearly, our studies of transient photocurrents elucidated the charge extraction, accumulation, and recombination in OSCs. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据