4.6 Article

Deep blue, efficient, moderate microcavity organic light-emitting diodes

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 137-145

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.10.011

关键词

Organic light-emitting diodes; Microcavity; Bragg mirror; Blue

资金

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2008-03573, R11-2005048-00000-0]
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy/Institute for Information Technology Advancement [2009-F-020-01]
  3. Kookmin University of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two types of microcavity blue organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) with a dielectric Bragg mirror (two different center wavelengths, type-A approximate to 465, type-B approximate to 470 nm) were designed to achieve the color coordinates of NTSC blue standard and enhance the quantum efficiency in the normal direction. A moderate microcavity OLED was defined as a microcavity OLED with a single pair of TiO2/SiO2 high/low dielectric layers inserted between an indium tin oxide (ITO) layer and a glass substrate. The moderate microcavity blue OLED doped with 9,10-bis(3',5'-diphenylphenyl)-10-(3',5'-diphenylbiphenyl-4 ''-yl)anthracene (TAT) exhibited excellent color coordinates (type-A; x=0.143, y=0.068, type-B; x=0.139, y=0.081), which were better than the color coordinates of the NTSC standard (0.140, 0.080) and the TAT-doped conventional noncavity OLED (0.156, 0.094). There were approximately 60% and 54% improvement in the relative quantum efficiency of the type-B TAT-doped moderate microcavity OLED, respectively, compared to those of the conventional noncavity reference OLED (ITO = 150 nm) and other reference type-II with an identical ITO layer thickness (ITO = 85 nm). These improvements in color coordinates and the relative quantum efficiency were attributed to the optimization of narrowed spectrum bandwidth and enhanced integrated spectrum intensity in the TAT-doped blue OLED, resulting from the effective microcavity effect. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据