4.6 Article

Downregulation and translocation of nuclear ING4 is correlated with tumorigenesis and progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 217-223

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.01.004

关键词

HNSCC; ING4; Tumorigenesis; Progression; 14-3-3 eta; p300; p21

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Technology, and Culture [20659109, 21790624]
  2. Uehara Memorial Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ING4 (inhibitor of growth gene 4) is a new member of the ING gene family and is implicated in chromatin remodeling and repression of cell growth. In order to explore the roles of ING4 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), ING4 expression was assessed in 214 cases of HNSCC by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray, and in three oral SCC cell lines by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. Expression of ING4 was also compared to clinicopathological variables, TUNEL assay staining, and the expression of several tumorigenic markers. We found nuclear expression of ING4 was gradually decreased from non-cancerous epithelium and dysplasia to HNSCC and was negatively correlated with a poorly-differentiated status, T staging, and TNM staging in HNSCC. In contrast, cytoplasmic expression of ING4 was significantly increased in HNSCC and was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and 14-3-3 eta expression. In addition, nuclear expression of ING4 was positively correlated with p21 and p300 expression and with the apoptotic index. These results suggest that the decreases in nuclear ING4 may play important roles in tumorigenesis, progression and tumor differentiation in HNSCC. Increases in cytoplasmic ING4 may be due to 14-3-3 eta binding and may also be involved in malignant progression. Nuclear ING4 may modulate the transactivation of target genes, promoting apoptosis and cell cycle arrest through interactions with p300 and p21. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据